m (Text replacement - " " to " ") |
(Changed "Rating" to "Content".) |
||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
Thoughts on this proposed approach? | Thoughts on this proposed approach? | ||
{{Block indent|*No major objections. One concern was that it will be just another site check for information. Currently we have the Wiki, talk pages, and Forums, and this new site will add yet another site that needs to be checked. }} | |||
{{Block indent|*Is DevNet there for everyone to add information, or is Ben the only one who keeps the discussions updated in DevNet? }} | |||
{{Block indent|*If the conversation is going on in the Forums, who would take it and move it onto the backlog. }} | |||
{{Block indent|*For example, the current Poll in the Forum related to the red links in search results now has 14 votes. Is the voting over? Is this feature/enhancement automatically moved to the backlog? Has it been moved already? Where is it in the priority? }} | |||
{{Block indent|*I am concerned that the majority of the backlog will be content backlog and the DevNet tool is only geared toward tracking engineering backlog. }} | |||
{{Block indent|*Wikicode backlog is also another aspect of our tracking needs. }} | |||
{{Block indent|*We need three backlogs: Content, Wikicode, Engineering}} | |||
{{Block indent|1=*From my discussions with Fran, I believe the definitions are as follows: Content = anything that most any contributor can handle; Wikicode = anyone at least a little more technical that can work in Wikitext, create templates, etc.; Engineering = only FamilySearch.org employees can work on. [[User:Thomas Lerman|Thomas_Lerman]] 22:20, 9 February 2010 (UTC)|2=2}} | |||
=== Feedback Requested: proposed changes to our FamilySearch wiki license === | === Feedback Requested: proposed changes to our FamilySearch wiki license === | ||
| Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
The role needs to include the emphasis on additional responsibility of "assisting" the contributor including leading the contributors to various tools when asked by email. [[User:Dsammy|dsammy]] 21:10, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | The role needs to include the emphasis on additional responsibility of "assisting" the contributor including leading the contributors to various tools when asked by email. [[User:Dsammy|dsammy]] 21:10, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
{{Block indent|Yes, I agree the role of moderator needs reviewing and redefining. --[[User:JensenFA|Fran]] 21:15, 9 February 2010 (UTC)}} | |||
== Stay Informed == | == Stay Informed == | ||
edits