Template talk:FHL: Difference between revisions

m
added comment
(Reply)
m (added comment)
Line 127: Line 127:


:I am working on getting information from HQ that will dictate how we interface with the FHLC. Depending on their answers will depend on how this template will expand. It is not a problem with how it is written. I have asked for suggestions a while back and implemented what was requested. Recent requests require information that I am trying to request. Answers probably will not come until after NGS. [[User:Thomas Lerman|Thomas_Lerman]] 05:08, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
:I am working on getting information from HQ that will dictate how we interface with the FHLC. Depending on their answers will depend on how this template will expand. It is not a problem with how it is written. I have asked for suggestions a while back and implemented what was requested. Recent requests require information that I am trying to request. Answers probably will not come until after NGS. [[User:Thomas Lerman|Thomas_Lerman]] 05:08, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
== Which to keep and which to get rid of ==
Under "Are these needed?" section - first two items requires 2nd step to get to main record. They are not wanted or encouraged. The one named "FHL Collection", is the exact one we have been asking for long time because they are the main records we want to go to right away. Just get rid of "item", and add comment that nothing is to be added after the record id number at all. [[User:Dsammy|dsammy]] 20:32, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
23,837

edits