FamilySearch Wiki:Purpose and Appropriate Topics: Difference between revisions

FamilySearch Wiki:Purpose and Appropriate Topics (view source)

Revision as of 15:05, 16 February 2010

191 bytes added , 16 February 2010

no edit summary

VisualWikitext

RitcheyMT

4,497

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{Policy}}
+{{Policy}}&nbsp;{{ToDo|This page needs revision}} __NOTOC__
-{{ToDo|This page needs revision}}
-__NOTOC__
 == FamilySearch Wiki is...  ==
-FamilySearch Wiki is a tool people can use to learn how to find their ancestors. It offers information on how to find, use, and analyze records of genealogical value. The site’s content is variously targeted to beginners, intermediate researchers, and experts.<sup>1</sup>
+FamilySearch Wiki is a tool people can use to learn how to find their ancestors. It offers information on how to find, use, and analyze records of genealogical value. The site’s content is variously targeted to beginners, intermediate researchers, and experts.<sup>1</sup> Some suitable types of content for the wiki are:
+*How to find, use, and analyze&nbsp;records that are genealogically useful.
+*Historical definitions of legal terms, occupations, and other terms&nbsp;that are useful to genealogists.
+*
+<br>
 == FamilySearch Wiki is not...  ==
@@ Line 30: / Line 34: @@
 *Methods of citing genealogical sources.
 *Power usage of an important computer application’s features in finding or analyzing genealogical records.
 *Use of computer hardware in genealogy.
+*Lists of Family History Library materials derived from the Family History Library Catalog (FHLC). The wiki isn't meant to replicate the&nbsp;FHLC. However,&nbsp;when a FHLC entry fails to&nbsp;provide&nbsp;enough information for patrons to be able to use a resource, the wiki, like the in-house Registers at the FHL, can complement the FHLC entry.
+*Information on specific repositories.&nbsp;The wiki is not intended to replicate the catalogs of other repositories.&nbsp;To what extent should the wiki include information on a specific library or archive and its collection?
+*Information on genealogical groups, such as genealogical societies, companies, or NPOs. Although the wiki&nbsp;&nbsp;
 Writings on these topics can easily become bloated. For instance, while some kinds of geographic information can help genealogists learn where their ancestors may have migrated, others have little or no bearing on genealogy. When writing on any topic, then, the best rule of thumb is to ask “Have I made a good case as to how this information helps someone find, use, or analyze genealogical records?”
@@ Line 38: / Line 45: @@
 The community should discuss whether we want the site to include the following items:
-*Historical definitions of legal terms, occupations, etc. In other words, do we want FamilySearch Wiki to become a genealogical dictionary? How would this affect the search experience and navigation of the site? Should we outsource dictionary definitions?
 *Social networking. What are the possible applications/manifestations/values of social networking in genealogy, and which ones should we enable/disallow?
 *Predictions. There is value to what the future of genealogy will and should bring. To what extent should it be covered on this site?
 *Long lists of Websites. What is long? Assuming we don't want to replicate Cyndislist, what limits should govern us in adding links?
 *Limited-visibility content. Content that only members of a certain workgroup can see.
-*Long lists of Family History Library materials which are listed in the Family History Library Catalog. For example, Registers are FHL in-house publications designed to help patrons find resources faster than if they were to use the Family History Library Catalog alone.
+*Long lists of Family History Library materials that are not viewable on the Family History Library Catalog (FHLC). For instance, thousands of Greek films are in the FHL's collection, but are not viewable on the catalog. Should these be listed on the wiki?
-*Long lists of Family History Library materials that are not viewable on the Family History Library Catalog. For instance, thousands of Greek films are in the FHL's collection, but are not viewable on the catalog. Should these be listed on the wiki?
+*Alternate place names. Taken to its terminus, an effort to identify and post alternate place names becomes a names authority table. What should this site's limit be?
-*Alternate place names. Taken to its terminus, an effort to identify and post alternate place names becomes a names authority table. What should this site's limits be?
 *World Records Manager. Taken to its terminus, an effort to identify the best records to satisfy research objectives in any country in any time period using sources from anywhere becomes a catalog of all the world's genealogical records. What should our limits be?
 *Name studies, lists of common names for an area, or guidance as to the geographic distribution of names.
 *Locality-centric research advice. To what extent should the wiki give advice to patrons based on where/how they access records? Should we give advice on satisfying research objective X in Library Y? How will localized advice be navigated, searched, and identified by title?
-*Information on specific repositories. To what extent should the wiki include information on a specific library or archive and its collection?
+***Political information relating to genealogy, such as a bill that will restrict access to a record collection, or a move to purge a library's genealogical collection.
-*Information on genealogical groups, such as genealogical societies, companies, or NPOs.
-*Political information relating to genealogy, such as a bill that will restrict access to a record collection, or a move to purge a library's genealogical collection.
 ----