1,461
edits
FamilySearch Wiki talk:Reviewer: Difference between revisions
FamilySearch Wiki talk:Reviewer (view source)
Revision as of 10:42, 3 November 2009
, 3 November 2009add my opinion
(voting) |
(add my opinion) |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
My vote is to have a Reviewer that has a job (e.g. the missionaries) to review and upload, and to have an Uploader role for the people we trust and who get a free ticket to by-pass the image review process. Uploader and Reviewer, both roles both names. [[User:Jimgreene|Jimgreene]] 18:39, 2 November 2009 (UTC) | My vote is to have a Reviewer that has a job (e.g. the missionaries) to review and upload, and to have an Uploader role for the people we trust and who get a free ticket to by-pass the image review process. Uploader and Reviewer, both roles both names. [[User:Jimgreene|Jimgreene]] 18:39, 2 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
OK, I surrender! In the interest of simplicity, I would like to see the title remain one word. So maybe "uploader" isn't so bad after all. [[User:Jbparker|Jbparker]] 19:33, 2 November 2009 (UTC) | OK, I surrender! In the interest of simplicity, I would like to see the title remain one word. So maybe "uploader" isn't so bad after all. [[User:Jbparker|Jbparker]] 19:33, 2 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
Vote recorded below, but wanted to add my opinion in agreement with Jim that we should keep the reviewer as a separate role from Uploader, even if the rights are the same. In the future they may diverge. Even now, the Uploader doesn't approve others' images, only their own, right? [[User:Alan|Alan]] 16:42, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
==== Vote today! Polls close 3 November @ 1:00 pm wiki time.<br> ==== | ==== Vote today! Polls close 3 November @ 1:00 pm wiki time.<br> ==== | ||