Template talk:FHL: Difference between revisions

Template talk:FHL (view source)

109 bytes added , 17 July 2015

no edit summary

1,147

edits

@@ Line 222: / Line 222: @@
 :That is good to know, Randy. However, I have heard from someone else that it was not persistent. I am not sure who to believe at this moment. I will be changing the docs hopefully soon. [[User:Thomas Lerman|Thomas_Lerman]] 23:35, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
-The title number is integral to both OLIB and CDS. It would be very expensive for the department to abandon OLIB other than to move to its OCLC replacement product. It would be practically impossible. CDS is of our own authorship, so replacing title numbers there is a possibility, but as long as CDS is linked to OLIB, it is unlikely CDS will abandon title numbers. [[User:RaymondRS|RaymondRS]] 15:35, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
+The title number is integral to both OLIB and CDS. It would be extremely expensive for the department to abandon OCLC OLIB. If it did, it would probably move to its OCLC replacement product, which would probably retain title number. CDS is of our own authorship, so replacing title numbers there is a possibility, but as long as CDS is linked to OLIB, it is unlikely CDS will abandon title numbers. Paul Gentry, the database guru in cataloging could inform you better than I. [[User:RaymondRS|RaymondRS]] 15:35, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 == Which to keep and which to get rid of  ==