Template talk:WorldCat: Difference between revisions

From FamilySearch Wiki
m (comment - failed)
(Add comment)
Line 6: Line 6:


Tried first two methods, both failed miserably. They linked to template instead of the item in the OCLC. [[User:Dsammy|dsammy]] 07:06, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Tried first two methods, both failed miserably. They linked to template instead of the item in the OCLC. [[User:Dsammy|dsammy]] 07:06, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
:I would like to find out more about the region version of WorldCat. Is there a website that has the various regional WorldCats listed? What failed miserably? I do not understand your last two sentences. Maybe include examples, please. Some discussion started [[User_talk:CottrellS#If_wpd.7Cxxxx_works.2C_why_not_oclc.7Cxxx.3F|here]]. [[User:Thomas Lerman|Thomas Lerman]] 14:59, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:59, 13 August 2009

This template is fine but it doesn't work with regional WorldCat/OCLC such as Summit.worldcat.org

Books, etc listed in Summit more often than not are not listed in general WorldCat/OCLC.

Wallowa County, Oregon shows a lot of records not in the standard one but limited and found only in the Summit. dsammy 05:29, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Tried first two methods, both failed miserably. They linked to template instead of the item in the OCLC. dsammy 07:06, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

I would like to find out more about the region version of WorldCat. Is there a website that has the various regional WorldCats listed? What failed miserably? I do not understand your last two sentences. Maybe include examples, please. Some discussion started here. Thomas Lerman 14:59, 13 August 2009 (UTC)