FamilySearch Wiki talk:The Un-Portal Page: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Comment)
No edit summary
Line 106: Line 106:


:I agree . . . if the "un-portal" pages are truly easier to create and edit, then we should use that instead. I personally do not feel like we have heard much response to which is easier or not. Yes, we want to get a much greater number of people to contribute and therefore the easier the better. [[User:Thomas Lerman|Thomas Lerman]] 15:58, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
:I agree . . . if the "un-portal" pages are truly easier to create and edit, then we should use that instead. I personally do not feel like we have heard much response to which is easier or not. Yes, we want to get a much greater number of people to contribute and therefore the easier the better. [[User:Thomas Lerman|Thomas Lerman]] 15:58, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
=== '''Dilts'''  ===
I vote for un-Portal. I like the ease, simplicity, flexibility and cleaner look. A user can find plenty on a regular page, and learn to edit it faster in my opinion.
Whether a portal is easier for search engines to find and list I know not. But I do know trying to create a portal page is much more complex than creating a nice regular page. [[User:Diltsgd|Diltsgd]] 17:46, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
73,385

edits