23,837
edits
FamilySearch Wiki talk:The Un-Portal Page: Difference between revisions
FamilySearch Wiki talk:The Un-Portal Page (view source)
Revision as of 02:01, 3 July 2009
, 3 July 2009comment
(Comment) |
m (comment) |
||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
I appreciate Lermans insight and thoughts into this and agree with his comments. I'm not convinced the UnPortal really does help with search engine indexing. Given the sheer size of 2 million plus articles in the English Wikipedia and their heavy use of the Portal, they don't seem to be worried about Portal or UnPortal. As far as my experience, generally the Denmark and Sweden content comes up pretty quick using key words in a search engine. Maybe the general standardization of titles and formatting has helped. I do like the UnPortal in relation to ease of use. I'd like to suggest leaving the Portals as a Gate, and using UnPortals for SubPortal, or even individual article pages. <br> | I appreciate Lermans insight and thoughts into this and agree with his comments. I'm not convinced the UnPortal really does help with search engine indexing. Given the sheer size of 2 million plus articles in the English Wikipedia and their heavy use of the Portal, they don't seem to be worried about Portal or UnPortal. As far as my experience, generally the Denmark and Sweden content comes up pretty quick using key words in a search engine. Maybe the general standardization of titles and formatting has helped. I do like the UnPortal in relation to ease of use. I'd like to suggest leaving the Portals as a Gate, and using UnPortals for SubPortal, or even individual article pages. <br> | ||
<br> | :Wikipedia is very much "Un-Portal", no boxes to clutter except for info-boxes usually containing basic facts. I've been editing some of the pages there and have yet to see a "Portal" type page. [[User:Dsammy|dsammy]] 08:01, 3 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
<br> | |||
=== Maness === | === Maness === | ||