3,967
edits
FamilySearch Wiki talk:Source Citation Formats: Difference between revisions
FamilySearch Wiki talk:Source Citation Formats (view source)
Revision as of 12:46, 24 June 2009
, 24 June 2009no edit summary
(Format) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
:There you go, Jimmy -- ''thinking'' again. Nice catch. [[User:Ritcheymt|Ritcheymt]] 03:41, 15 June 2009 (UTC) | :There you go, Jimmy -- ''thinking'' again. Nice catch. [[User:Ritcheymt|Ritcheymt]] 03:41, 15 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
=== Extension? === | === Extension? === | ||
I agree with Thomas that it would be nice to have a fill-in-the-blank form for source references. Otherwise, the Chicago Manual of Style meets the needs of the general public. Charlene M. Pipkin [[User:Genguide|Genguide]] 18:46, 24 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
I must say that reading through this discussion glazed my eyes over. I really do not remember what all of these source reference formats even look like. It would be nice if examples were shown to remind us about them. In the end, I believe the nicest thing would be to have an extension to the Editor that allows one to enter the source reference in a dialog box and then it formats it in a standard format. Does this type of thing exist? [[User:Thomas Lerman|Thomas Lerman]] 14:25, 15 June 2009 (UTC) | I must say that reading through this discussion glazed my eyes over. I really do not remember what all of these source reference formats even look like. It would be nice if examples were shown to remind us about them. In the end, I believe the nicest thing would be to have an extension to the Editor that allows one to enter the source reference in a dialog box and then it formats it in a standard format. Does this type of thing exist? [[User:Thomas Lerman|Thomas Lerman]] 14:25, 15 June 2009 (UTC) | ||