4,497
edits
(Added comments re. Alan's list of considerations.) |
(formatting) |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
::These are great points, Alan Here are some comments: | ::These are great points, Alan Here are some comments: | ||
::I disagree with #2. Having to reach consensus to agree on whether a guideline is even needed seems like having a meeting to plan a meeting. Seems overly bureaucratic. Instead, I think the litmus test for whether a guideline is needed is A) whether anyone joins in the discussion and B) whether some join in by saying "It's silly that we're talking about making rules about this issue." | ::I disagree with #2. Having to reach consensus to agree on whether a guideline is even needed seems like having a meeting to plan a meeting. Seems overly bureaucratic. Instead, I think the litmus test for whether a guideline is needed is A) whether anyone joins in the discussion and B) whether some join in by saying "It's silly that we're talking about making rules about this issue." | ||
::Regarding #3 and 5, I believe in Wikipedia there is no end of a congressional session, as it were. In other words, I don't think there is a time limit between when a user opens discussion on an issue and when it must be voted on. In fact, Wikipedia lets users put their own time limits on issues, ostensibly so that if a user is concerned enough about an issue to raise it, that usually means he is relying on a timely decision so he can go forward with a project. | ::Regarding #3 and 5, I believe in Wikipedia there is no end of a congressional session, as it were. In other words, I don't think there is a time limit between when a user opens discussion on an issue and when it must be voted on. In fact, Wikipedia lets users put their own time limits on issues, ostensibly so that if a user is concerned enough about an issue to raise it, that usually means he is relying on a timely decision so he can go forward with a project. | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
::#8 feels litigious. If we want a policy changed or deleted, why not just add an argument to the discussion page? | ::#8 feels litigious. If we want a policy changed or deleted, why not just add an argument to the discussion page? | ||
[[User:Ritcheymt|Ritcheymt]] 22:01, 9 June 2009 (UTC) | ::[[User:Ritcheymt|Ritcheymt]] 22:01, 9 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Governing body needed == | == Governing body needed == |
edits