4,497
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution | Wikipedia:Dispute resolution | ||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Don%27t_disrupt_Wikipedia_to_prove_a_point Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point] | |||
Wikipedia:Disrupt | Wikipedia:Disrupt | ||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:DISRUPT Wikipedia:Disruptive editing] | [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:DISRUPT Wikipedia:Disruptive editing] | ||
Wikipedia:Don't be a fanatic | Wikipedia:Don't be a fanatic | ||
Line 55: | Line 57: | ||
Wikipedia:Game | Wikipedia:Game | ||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GAME Wikipedia:Gaming the system] | [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GAME Wikipedia:Gaming the system] | ||
Wikipedia:Help desk | Wikipedia:Help desk | ||
Line 175: | Line 177: | ||
....Another aspect is that because of the wide-open nature of the editorial process, there is no bottleneck of control through which the content can readily be controlled or massaged by any given individual or interest group. As well, all edits and actions, including past historical versions, are visible to all editors. The Wiki model itself mitigates extremely strongly against control of articles being manipulated by any one interest group, as there are no obvious applicable points of weakness or "approved circle", through which editorial decisions must pass. As a result, maintaining vandalism or a specific viewpoint is all but impossible in the long term, and Wikipedia is extremely resilient long-term against bias, censorship, or manipulation of its articles. | ....Another aspect is that because of the wide-open nature of the editorial process, there is no bottleneck of control through which the content can readily be controlled or massaged by any given individual or interest group. As well, all edits and actions, including past historical versions, are visible to all editors. The Wiki model itself mitigates extremely strongly against control of articles being manipulated by any one interest group, as there are no obvious applicable points of weakness or "approved circle", through which editorial decisions must pass. As a result, maintaining vandalism or a specific viewpoint is all but impossible in the long term, and Wikipedia is extremely resilient long-term against bias, censorship, or manipulation of its articles. | ||
<br> | |||
=== Miscellaneous items === | === Miscellaneous items === |
edits