FamilySearch Wiki:Contributors Meeting 3 April 2014: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (→New Agenda Items: m) |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
Do we need to schedule more time for this meeting in the future? | Do we need to schedule more time for this meeting in the future? | ||
::Would different day or later in day work better (evening, etc?)- European attendees that would be difficult for. Tech used to be included in this meeting, and this meeting lost something when that was removed. Warren would have some issued with time switch (he's our Tech person) | |||
Projects: we need feedbacks on the effectiveness of how they are currently created, organized, and recorded in the wiki. Alternatives? <br>{{box | Projects: we need feedbacks on the effectiveness of how they are currently created, organized, and recorded in the wiki. Alternatives? <br>{{box |
Revision as of 13:09, 3 April 2014
WebEx ID: 990 733 804; Join the meeting; Dial-in number: Local / International: 1-801-240-9700 U.S. Toll-Free: 1-855-537-4000; 1 p.m. Mountain time on Thursdays
- You can join up to 10 minutes early. If you try to join the meeting at any other time, you will get an error that the meeting doesn't exist.
Welcome[edit | edit source]
Kudos go to[edit | edit source]
Updates and follow up[edit | edit source]
Discussions on Yammer
Wiki Support Update
Moderators and Adopters[edit | edit source]
- Conversation in the call:
Wiki Content[edit | edit source]
.
Community Council Report[edit | edit source]
Items to pose to Community Council[edit | edit source]
Business/Announcements[edit | edit source]
New Agenda Items[edit | edit source]
A new place to communicate: Yammer - FamilySearch Wiki & Contributors Group
Do we need to schedule more time for this meeting in the future?
- Would different day or later in day work better (evening, etc?)- European attendees that would be difficult for. Tech used to be included in this meeting, and this meeting lost something when that was removed. Warren would have some issued with time switch (he's our Tech person)
Projects: we need feedbacks on the effectiveness of how they are currently created, organized, and recorded in the wiki. Alternatives?
|
|