FamilySearch Wiki:Contributors Meeting 1 November 2012: Difference between revisions
m (added item) |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=== Updates and follow up === | === Updates and follow up === | ||
:* | :*Problems with getting emails for watched pages have been corrected in Staging, as well as gridlines for tables, etc. We still don't have a date for the implementation of the release, however. | ||
=== Business/Announcements === | === Business/Announcements === | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
=== New Agenda Items === | === New Agenda Items === | ||
:*[https://www.familysearch.org/learn/wiki/en/Category:Professional_Genealogists Category:Professional Genealogists] pages. I received several emails that express concerns. Clarification will be appreciated. | :*[https://www.familysearch.org/learn/wiki/en/Category:Professional_Genealogists Category:Professional Genealogists] pages. I received several emails that express concerns. Clarification will be appreciated. | ||
::"a master place was created on the wiki for any professional to add themselves... | ::"a master place was created on the wiki for any professional to add themselves... | ||
::"Someone was given the job of doing those pages and then was transferred... continuing those pages has fallen on the Community Mtg leadership.... | ::"Someone was given the job of doing those pages and then was transferred... continuing those pages has fallen on the Community Mtg leadership.... | ||
::"they have kept the reason why its being allowed pretty hush hush, except that it IS allowed from direction given at the top. | ::"they have kept the reason why its being allowed pretty hush hush, except that it IS allowed from direction given at the top. | ||
::"perhaps there were some other issues---like monitoring quality of professional work provided. | ::"perhaps there were some other issues---like monitoring quality of professional work provided. | ||
::"Personally, I think having a place to track down professional and even unaccredited professionals is a good idea. | ::"Personally, I think having a place to track down professional and even unaccredited professionals is a good idea. | ||
::"BUT I do NOT think they should be the decision body for where redirects go. (aka they should not be the ones to plop in the links on the state and county pages to the "professional lists" pages. | ::"BUT I do NOT think they should be the decision body for where redirects go. (aka they should not be the ones to plop in the links on the state and county pages to the "professional lists" pages. | ||
::"I think that should be reserved ONLY for wikiproject TEAMS. (Of which it would be okay for a professional to be a member but NOT the chief decision maker.) | ::"I think that should be reserved ONLY for wikiproject TEAMS. (Of which it would be okay for a professional to be a member but NOT the chief decision maker.) | ||
::[[User:AdkinsWH|AdkinsWH]] 03:02, 1 November 2012 (UTC) | ::[[User:AdkinsWH|AdkinsWH]] 03:02, 1 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
::How do answers in this forum thread affect the above? [https://www.familysearch.org/learn/forums/en/showthread.php?t=88 Question about photoduplication services] Has to do with advertising services | ::How do answers in this forum thread affect the above? [https://www.familysearch.org/learn/forums/en/showthread.php?t=88 Question about photoduplication services] Has to do with advertising services | ||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
'''Comments added since last week''' | '''Comments added since last week''' | ||
*[https://www.familysearch.org/learn/forums/en/showthread.php?t=10282 Status of the wiki today] Some still not receiving email notifications on watched pages. | *[https://www.familysearch.org/learn/forums/en/showthread.php?t=10282 Status of the wiki today] Some still not receiving email notifications on watched pages. | ||
*<br> | *<br> | ||
Revision as of 09:53, 1 November 2012
MeetingPlace ID: 7770; Join the meeting; Dial-in number: 877-453-7266 1 p.m. Mountain time on Thursdays
- You can join up to 10 minutes early. If you try to join the meeting at any other time, you will get an error that the meeting doesn't exist.
- Prior to joining the meeting for the first time, run the MeetingPlace Test to verify that you can participate in a web meeting.
Introduce new members[edit | edit source]
Kudos go to ... [edit | edit source]
Updates and follow up[edit | edit source]
- Problems with getting emails for watched pages have been corrected in Staging, as well as gridlines for tables, etc. We still don't have a date for the implementation of the release, however.
Business/Announcements[edit | edit source]
New Agenda Items[edit | edit source]
- Category:Professional Genealogists pages. I received several emails that express concerns. Clarification will be appreciated.
- "a master place was created on the wiki for any professional to add themselves...
- "Someone was given the job of doing those pages and then was transferred... continuing those pages has fallen on the Community Mtg leadership....
- "they have kept the reason why its being allowed pretty hush hush, except that it IS allowed from direction given at the top.
- "perhaps there were some other issues---like monitoring quality of professional work provided.
- "Personally, I think having a place to track down professional and even unaccredited professionals is a good idea.
- "BUT I do NOT think they should be the decision body for where redirects go. (aka they should not be the ones to plop in the links on the state and county pages to the "professional lists" pages.
- "I think that should be reserved ONLY for wikiproject TEAMS. (Of which it would be okay for a professional to be a member but NOT the chief decision maker.)
- AdkinsWH 03:02, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
- How do answers in this forum thread affect the above? Question about photoduplication services Has to do with advertising services
Forums Overview[edit | edit source]
- Be part of the solution! Make your opinions known! Post comments to an existing thread or start a new discussion at Wiki Contributors Corner forum.
| Current forum threads of interest:
New since last week
Comments added since last week
Decisions made since last week |
|
|