2,605
edits
→Categorizing
(→Categorizing: good idea) |
|||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
:I think that adding additional categories for scheduled situations would be better. Each article should be added to the location category, but a category for scheduled collections would useful and perhaps another maintenance category for collections without a CID. I think this is a good suggestion. --[[User:Cottrells|Steve]] {{toolbar|[[User talk:Cottrells|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Cottrells|contribs]]}} 07:03, 6 July 2012 (UTC) | :I think that adding additional categories for scheduled situations would be better. Each article should be added to the location category, but a category for scheduled collections would useful and perhaps another maintenance category for collections without a CID. I think this is a good suggestion. --[[User:Cottrells|Steve]] {{toolbar|[[User talk:Cottrells|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Cottrells|contribs]]}} 07:03, 6 July 2012 (UTC) | ||
::I agree. I think the way you explained it is best. Can you make the change? I noticed this because these articles are being translated to the Spanish wiki whether they are available or not. It appears that they are being translated by location and not availability, which means someone will have to find the scheduled ones later and update them. I didn't want to change the template on the Spanish wiki unless it was done here as well. I don't think there should be different versions of this template (other than translated display text and different categories, of course) on the different language wikis. [[User:Lotje2|Lotje2]] 23:04, 6 July 2012 (UTC) | |||