4,291
edits
No edit summary |
Laurenwake (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*'''South Africa > Free State > Kanonheuwel''' should read South Africa > Cape > Kanonheuwel<br> | *'''South Africa > Free State > Kanonheuwel''' should read South Africa > Cape > Kanonheuwel<br> | ||
'''Question #2''': The records found at browse point '''South Africa > Cape > Ladismith''' > Baptisms 1879-1907 are not in chronological sequence. How do I find the record I want?<br>'''Answer #2''': It appears as if all the right hand pages were filmed then all the left hand pages. When they were combined, they were not in correct sequence. For the most part, there are page numbers on the images which will enable you to arrow forward and back to the correct page. Also, it should be noted that page 210 was not captured in the filming process. | '''Question #2''': The records found at browse point '''South Africa > Cape > Ladismith''' > Baptisms 1879-1907 and '''South Africa > Cape > Franschhoek''' > Baptisms 1877-1950 are not in chronological sequence. How do I find the record I want?<br>'''Answer #2''': It appears as if all the right hand pages were filmed then all the left hand pages. When they were combined, they were not in correct sequence. For the most part, there are page numbers on the images which will enable you to arrow forward and back to the correct page. Also, it should be noted that page 210 of Ladismith parish was not captured in the filming process. | ||
The attached table has been created to link the page numbers of Franschoek Baptisms to the corresponding image number. It can be found at [[Dutch Reformed Church in Franschhoek, Cape, South Africa Collection Guide]]. | |||
'''Question #3''': At browse point '''South Africa > Transvaal > NG Kerk''' > Baptisms, memberships, 1997-1998, A-H, there are duplicate sets of records. Images 865-1638 are duplicates of images 1-764. Images 1639-1728 are duplicates of images 765-864. Should there be other records in place of the duplicate records?<br>'''Answer #3''': Although the records are duplicated, there are no missing records. | '''Question #3''': At browse point '''South Africa > Transvaal > NG Kerk''' > Baptisms, memberships, 1997-1998, A-H, there are duplicate sets of records. Images 865-1638 are duplicates of images 1-764. Images 1639-1728 are duplicates of images 765-864. Should there be other records in place of the duplicate records?<br>'''Answer #3''': Although the records are duplicated, there are no missing records. |
edits