FamilySearch Wiki talk:Community Dialogue Summary: Difference between revisions
(Thinking through arrangement and maintenance) |
m (added comment about maintaining this page) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Thinking through arrangement -- with least amount of "bookkeeping." | A decision has been made to not keep this updated, at this time. We encourage dialogue on the Forums. | ||
<br> | |||
Thinking through arrangement -- with least amount of "bookkeeping." | |||
*Chrono is easy to maintain, but less helpful to the users. | *Chrono is easy to maintain, but less helpful to the users. | ||
[[FamilySearch Wiki:Community Dialogue Chronological|By month and year: discussions in meetings and forum threads]] | |||
[[FamilySearch Wiki:Community Dialogue Chronological|By month and year: discussions in meetings and forum threads]] | |||
*Topical is most effective for users, but harder to maintain. | *Topical is most effective for users, but harder to maintain. | ||
[[FamilySearch Wiki:Community Dialogue Topical|Decisions and discussion summaries by topic]] | |||
[[FamilySearch Wiki:Community Dialogue Topical|Decisions and discussion summaries by topic]] | |||
What if the responsibility for the Chrono is one person (such as Wilma at the moment), and "interested parties" are assigned to maintain one section of the topical? | What if the responsibility for the Chrono is one person (such as Wilma at the moment), and "interested parties" are assigned to maintain one section of the topical? | ||
*How can we build accountability--and assurance that this maintenance is done? | |||
*How can we build accountability--and assurance that this maintenance is done? | |||
*Should we suggest that users browse the chrono as well? | *Should we suggest that users browse the chrono as well? | ||
[[User:AdkinsWH|AdkinsWH]] 18:21, 2 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
I will proceed to build the chronological and confer with Jane and Janell about the topical. [[User:AdkinsWH|AdkinsWH]] 18:21, 2 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:06, 13 October 2011
A decision has been made to not keep this updated, at this time. We encourage dialogue on the Forums.
Thinking through arrangement -- with least amount of "bookkeeping."
- Chrono is easy to maintain, but less helpful to the users.
By month and year: discussions in meetings and forum threads
- Topical is most effective for users, but harder to maintain.
Decisions and discussion summaries by topic
What if the responsibility for the Chrono is one person (such as Wilma at the moment), and "interested parties" are assigned to maintain one section of the topical?
- How can we build accountability--and assurance that this maintenance is done?
- Should we suggest that users browse the chrono as well?
I will proceed to build the chronological and confer with Jane and Janell about the topical. AdkinsWH 18:21, 2 March 2011 (UTC)