Template talk:Infobox England Jurisdictions: Difference between revisions
(→Rural Deaneries and Deaneries: current verses historical jurisdictions) |
m (Text replace - '{{unsigned|' to '{{subst:unsigned|') |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Rural Deaneries and Deaneries == | == Rural Deaneries and Deaneries == | ||
I looked at the code and am not sure how to add 'Deanry' into the mix. Rural Deanry and Deanry are not the same. | I looked at the code and am not sure how to add 'Deanry' into the mix. Rural Deanry and Deanry are not the same. <span style="font-size:90%;">— Preceding [[FamilySearch Wiki:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Donjgen|Donjgen]] ([[User talk:Donjgen|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Donjgen|contribs]]) 18:05, November 14, 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | ||
:Hi Don, I agree that Rural Deaneries are different, they are subdivisions of an archdeaconries comprising a number of parishes. Whereas a deanery is associated with a cathedral and so is not a jurisdiction. Perhaps it would help if you could please explain where and how you would like to use deanery instead of rural deanery. --[[User:Cottrells|Steve]] {{toolbar|[[User talk:Cottrells|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Cottrells|contribs]]}} 08:28, 15 November 2011 (UTC) | :Hi Don, I agree that Rural Deaneries are different, they are subdivisions of an archdeaconries comprising a number of parishes. Whereas a deanery is associated with a cathedral and so is not a jurisdiction. Perhaps it would help if you could please explain where and how you would like to use deanery instead of rural deanery. --[[User:Cottrells|Steve]] {{toolbar|[[User talk:Cottrells|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Cottrells|contribs]]}} 08:28, 15 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:03, 9 February 2012
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Infobox England Jurisdictions template. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
Rural Deaneries and Deaneries[edit source]
I looked at the code and am not sure how to add 'Deanry' into the mix. Rural Deanry and Deanry are not the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donjgen (talk | contribs) 18:05, November 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Don, I agree that Rural Deaneries are different, they are subdivisions of an archdeaconries comprising a number of parishes. Whereas a deanery is associated with a cathedral and so is not a jurisdiction. Perhaps it would help if you could please explain where and how you would like to use deanery instead of rural deanery. --Steve (talk| contribs) 08:28, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi Steve, I have put the jurisdiction table on the Heveningham parish page. I am trying to decide if I should put it on other parish pages. The reason I inquired about the Deanry, is because the early (pre 1813) Suffolk Bishop Transcripts on film are organized by year, then Deanry, then Parish. I thought it would be helpful to have the Deanry recorded in this table. I don't believe that I have found any other county that has there Bishop Trancripts organized that way. As far as a finding aid at some time in the future someone will need to create a page listed with all the deanries and what parishes are in them. Donjgen 00:12, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Don, I see that you have added South Dunwich as the Rural Deanery for Heveningham parish, so do I take it that your concern is now resolved? I think you're right in the future a page about each deanery listing the parishes that form it would be useful for other researchers. I think the other issue to consider is boundary changes as Heveningham is now part of the Deanery of Halesworth, Archdeaconry of Suffolk, Diocese of St Edmundsbury & Ipswich. My view is that current information is presented with a historical listing of previous jurisdictions by time period. --Steve (talk| contribs) 17:57, 17 November 2011 (UTC)