FamilySearch Wiki talk:WikiProject Utah: Difference between revisions
(added format for comments to be made) |
(adding, rearranging) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
=== Layout Preferences === | === Layout Preferences === | ||
I would like to pattern many of the Utah project pages after the Idaho project. Please state your opinions. [[User:AdkinsWH|AdkinsWH]] 21:08, 30 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
<br> | |||
== Project Expectations == | |||
== Project Expectations == | |||
*Excellent state and county coverage, with contributions primarily by the community and with a minimum of paid FS employee time. | *Excellent state and county coverage, with contributions primarily by the community and with a minimum of paid FS employee time. | ||
| Line 15: | Line 13: | ||
=== Ideas === | === Ideas === | ||
=== Contents === | |||
I was looking at some of the county pages, some need help. <br>Yes I know you are right about the Utah county pages needing help. [[User:HoleDL|Dawne]] | |||
... I think under the content box [may] work for the [placement of the] moderator sign. I also like the lay out of the Idaho pages. --[[User:Jenson1|Jenson1]] 20:13, March 19, 2011 <br> | |||
I too like the Idaho pages. We would love to have you help make the Utah county pages as good as Idaho. [[User:HoleDL|Dawne]] <br> | === Layout === | ||
... I think under the content box [may] work for the [placement of the] moderator sign. I also like the lay out of the Idaho pages. --[[User:Jenson1|Jenson1]] 20:13, March 19, 2011 <br>I too like the Idaho pages. We would love to have you help make the Utah county pages as good as Idaho. [[User:HoleDL|Dawne]] <br> | |||
The layout of the Utah page is not ideal in my opinion. Comments have been made on the [[Talk:Utah|Discussion page]]. [[User:AdkinsWH|AdkinsWH]] 21:18, 30 May 2011 (UTC) <br> | |||
== Leadership == | == Leadership == | ||
| Line 32: | Line 31: | ||
== Community involvement == | == Community involvement == | ||
===Learn to better engage community | === Learn to better engage community === | ||
*Provide incentives? | *Provide incentives? | ||
| Line 40: | Line 39: | ||
*Social networking | *Social networking | ||
=== Welcome, stay connected with contributors === | === Moderators and adopters === | ||
I would like to be a moderator for Davis County, Utah. Can not get wikitext to accept my name.[[User:Jenson1]] | |||
<br> | |||
=== Welcome, stay connected with contributors === | |||
=== Train volunteers === | === Train volunteers === | ||
*Make specific training available for specific tasks | *Make specific training available for specific tasks | ||
== Project improvement == | == Project improvement == | ||
=== Identify typical tasks === | === Identify typical tasks === | ||
*Tasks at state and county levels are based on desired contents per content specialists. | *Tasks at state and county levels are based on desired contents per content specialists. | ||
=== Improve processes for other community projects === | === Improve processes for other community projects === | ||
=== Share learnings on the Wiki for future project leaders === | === Share learnings on the Wiki for future project leaders === | ||
== Communicate with FamilySearch == | == Communicate with FamilySearch == | ||
Revision as of 15:18, 30 May 2011
Utah Project Pages[edit source]
Layout Preferences[edit source]
I would like to pattern many of the Utah project pages after the Idaho project. Please state your opinions. AdkinsWH 21:08, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Project Expectations[edit source]
- Excellent state and county coverage, with contributions primarily by the community and with a minimum of paid FS employee time.
Ideas[edit source]
Contents[edit source]
I was looking at some of the county pages, some need help.
Yes I know you are right about the Utah county pages needing help. Dawne
Layout[edit source]
... I think under the content box [may] work for the [placement of the] moderator sign. I also like the lay out of the Idaho pages. --Jenson1 20:13, March 19, 2011
I too like the Idaho pages. We would love to have you help make the Utah county pages as good as Idaho. Dawne
The layout of the Utah page is not ideal in my opinion. Comments have been made on the Discussion page. AdkinsWH 21:18, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Leadership[edit source]
- Content specialists: Patsy, Marilyn, and Pat, with others they may invite.
- Community involvement: Wilma, Dawne and UGA representatives
- Scope of the project: The above plus the moderator (Fran)and a UGA representative.
Community involvement[edit source]
Learn to better engage community[edit source]
- Provide incentives?
- Invite county moderators/adopters?
- Contact consultants in FHC’s?
- Inform/enlist local experts and record custodians
- Social networking
Moderators and adopters[edit source]
I would like to be a moderator for Davis County, Utah. Can not get wikitext to accept my name.User:Jenson1
Welcome, stay connected with contributors[edit source]
Train volunteers[edit source]
- Make specific training available for specific tasks
Project improvement[edit source]
Identify typical tasks[edit source]
- Tasks at state and county levels are based on desired contents per content specialists.