Genealogical Maturity: Difference between revisions

Fixed table issue.
(Update evidence)
(Fixed table issue.)
(20 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Genealogical Maturity is a system of self evaluation and self improvement first proposed by the Ancestry Insider in 2009. The Genealogical Maturity improvement system measures one's understanding and use of the [[Genealogical Proof Standard|Genealogical Proof Standard]] and the associated Evidence Analysis Research Process Map. The system encourages improvement in five categories: sources, citations, information, evidence, and conclusions.<br>  
Genealogical Maturity is a system of self evaluation and self improvement first proposed by the Ancestry Insider in 2009. The Genealogical Maturity improvement system measures one's understanding and use of the [[Genealogical Proof Standard|Genealogical Proof Standard]] and the associated Evidence Analysis Research Process Map. The system encourages improvement in five categories: sources, citations, information, evidence, and conclusions.<br> See other articles in this series at:
:[[Sources and Baby Steps|Sources and Baby Steps]]
:[[Information Baby Steps|Information Baby Steps]]
:[[Evidence Baby Steps|Evidence Baby Steps]]
:[[Conclusions and Baby Steps|Conclusions and Baby Steps]]
:[[Citation Baby Steps|Citation Baby Steps]]
 


== Definitions  ==
== Definitions  ==
Line 7: Line 13:
'''source '''– 1. the origin that supplies information.<ref>''Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary'', online edition (www.m-w.com : accessed 23 November 2009), “source.”</ref> 2. “an artifact, book, document, film, person, recording, website, etc., from which information is obtained.”<ref>Elizabeth Shown Mills, CG, CGL, FNGS, FASG, FUGA, ''Evidence Explained: Citing History Sources from Artifacts to Cyberspace'', 2nd ed. [hereinafter, ''EE2''] (Baltimore, Maryland: Genealogical Publishing Company, 2009), 828.</ref>  
'''source '''– 1. the origin that supplies information.<ref>''Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary'', online edition (www.m-w.com : accessed 23 November 2009), “source.”</ref> 2. “an artifact, book, document, film, person, recording, website, etc., from which information is obtained.”<ref>Elizabeth Shown Mills, CG, CGL, FNGS, FASG, FUGA, ''Evidence Explained: Citing History Sources from Artifacts to Cyberspace'', 2nd ed. [hereinafter, ''EE2''] (Baltimore, Maryland: Genealogical Publishing Company, 2009), 828.</ref>  


'''citation '''– 1. “citations are statements in which we identify our source or sources for…particular [information].”<ref>Mills, ''EE2'', 42.</ref> 2. “a citation states where you found [the cited] piece of information.”<ref>Patricia Law Hatcher, CG, FASG, quoted in ''The Source'', ed. Loretto Dennis Szucs, FUGA, and Sandra Hargreaves Luebking, FUGA, 3rd ed. (Provo, Utah: Ancestry, 2006) p. 24; citing “How Do You Know?” in ''Producing a Quality Family History'' (Salt Lake City: Ancestry, 1996), 117.</ref>  
'''citation '''– 1. “citations are statements in which we identify our source or sources for…particular [informatio[[Category:Evaluating Evidence]].”<ref>Mills, ''EE2'', 42.</ref> 2. “a citation states where you found [the cited] piece of information.”<ref>Patricia Law Hatcher, CG, FASG, quoted in ''The Source'', ed. Loretto Dennis Szucs, FUGA, and Sandra Hargreaves Luebking, FUGA, 3rd ed. (Provo, Utah: Ancestry, 2006) p. 24; citing “How Do You Know?” in ''Producing a Quality Family History'' (Salt Lake City: Ancestry, 1996), 117.</ref>  


'''information '''- 1. “knowledge obtained from investigation.”<ref>''Merriam-Webster'', “information.”</ref> 2. “the content of a source—that is, its factual statements or its raw data.”<ref>Mills, ''EE2'', 24.</ref>  
'''information '''- 1. “knowledge obtained from investigation.”<ref>''Merriam-Webster'', “information.”</ref> 2. “the content of a source—that is, its factual statements or its raw data.”<ref>Mills, ''EE2'', 24.</ref>  
Line 13: Line 19:
'''evidence '''– 1. “something that furnishes proof.”<ref>''Merriam-Webster'', “evidence.”</ref> 2. “information that is relevant to the problem.”<ref>Mills, ''EE2'', 822.</ref> 3. analyzed and correlated information assessed to be of sufficient quality.<ref>Christine Rose,CG, CGL, FASG,, ''Genealogical Proof Standard: Building a Solid Case'' (San Jose, California: CR Publications, 2005), 2.</ref> 4. “the information that we conclude—after careful evaluation—supports or contradicts the statement we would like to make, or are about to make, about an ancestor.”<ref>The Board for Certification of Genealogists (BCG), ''The BCG Genealogical Standards Manual'', ed. Helen F. M. Leary, CG, CGL, FASG, (Provo, Utah: Ancestry, 2000), 8.</ref>  
'''evidence '''– 1. “something that furnishes proof.”<ref>''Merriam-Webster'', “evidence.”</ref> 2. “information that is relevant to the problem.”<ref>Mills, ''EE2'', 822.</ref> 3. analyzed and correlated information assessed to be of sufficient quality.<ref>Christine Rose,CG, CGL, FASG,, ''Genealogical Proof Standard: Building a Solid Case'' (San Jose, California: CR Publications, 2005), 2.</ref> 4. “the information that we conclude—after careful evaluation—supports or contradicts the statement we would like to make, or are about to make, about an ancestor.”<ref>The Board for Certification of Genealogists (BCG), ''The BCG Genealogical Standards Manual'', ed. Helen F. M. Leary, CG, CGL, FASG, (Provo, Utah: Ancestry, 2000), 8.</ref>  


'''conclusion '''– 1. “a reasoned judgment.”<ref>''Merriam-Webster'', “conclusion.”</ref> 2. “a decision [that should be] based on well-reasoned and thoroughly documented evidence gleaned from sound research.”<ref>Mills, ''EE2'', 820.</ref>  
'''conclusion '''– 1. “a reasoned judgment.”<ref>''Merriam-Webster'', “conclusion.”</ref> 2. “a decision [that should b[[Category:Evaluating Evidence]] based on well-reasoned and thoroughly documented evidence gleaned from sound research.”<ref name="EE820">Elizabeth Shown Mills, CG, CGL, FNGS, FASG, FUGA, ''Evidence Explained: Citing History Sources from Artifacts to Cyberspace'', 2nd ed. [hereinafter, ''EE2''] (Baltimore, Maryland: Genealogical Publishing Company, 2009), 820.</ref>


== Step 1. Self Evaluation  ==
== Step 1. Self Evaluation  ==
Line 21: Line 27:
=== Sources  ===
=== Sources  ===


{| width="100%" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1"
{{Template:Genealogical_Maturity_Sources_Table}}  
|-
! scope="col" | #
! scope="col" | Maturity Level
! scope="col" | Sources
! scope="col" | Check
|-
| 1.
| Entry
| Typically relies on compiled genealogies.
| <br>
|-
| 2.
| Emerging
| Mostly relies on compiled genealogies and online sources.
| <br>
|-
| 3.
| Practicing
| Uses a limited number of record types and repositories. Mostly relies on online and microfilmed sources.
| <br>
|-
| 4.
| Proficient
| Uses a wide variety of record types. Often contacts record custodians to obtain copies of high-quality sources.
| <br>
|-
| 5.
| Stellar
| Insightfully pursues research at multiple, targeted repositories, making use of a plethora of records and record types. "Burned counties" are not roadblocks.
| <br>
|}


=== Citations  ===
=== Citations  ===


{| width="100%" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1"
{{Template:Genealogical_Maturity_Citations_Table}}  
|-
! scope="col" | #
! scope="col" | Maturity Level
! scope="col" | Citations
! scope="col" | Check
|-
| 1.
| Entry
| Sees no need to record citations.<br>
| <br>
|-
| 2.
| Emerging
| Captures URLs for online sources and citations for published sources. <br>
| <br>
|-
| 3.
| Practicing
| Increasingly captures necessary information for manuscript sources.<br>
| <br>
|-
| 4.
| Proficient
| Gives complete and accurate source citations including provenance and quality assessment.
| <br>
|-
| 5.
| Stellar
| Overcomes limitations of genealogical software to create well organized, industry standard reference notes and source lists.
| <br>
|}


=== Information  ===
=== Information  ===


{| width="100%" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1"
{{Template:Genealogical_Maturity_Information_Table}}  
|-
! scope="col" | #
! scope="col" | Maturity Level
! scope="col" | Information
! scope="col" | Check
|-
| 1.
| Entry
| Typically does not realize the need to judge information quality and has no basis for doing so.
| <br>
|-
| 2.
| Emerging
| Emerging realization that information quality differs. Muddles evaluation by thinking of primary/secondary sources instead of primary/secondary information, leading to muddled evaluation when sources contain both.
| <br>
|-
| 3.
| Practicing
| Judges information by source type, informant knowledge, and record timing. Applies "primary/secondary" to information instead of sources.
| <br>
|-
| 4.
| Proficient
| Additionally, learns history necessary to recognize and evaluate all explicit information in a source.
| <br>
|-
| 5.
| Stellar
| Additionally, utilizes implicit information in a source. Finds information in cases like illegitimacy that stump most researchers.
| <br>
|}


=== Evidence  ===
=== Evidence  ===


{| width="100%" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1"
{{Template:Genealogical_Maturity_Evidence_Table}}  
|-
! scope="col" | #
! scope="col" | Maturity Level
! scope="col" | Evidence
! scope="col" | Check
|-
| 1.
| Entry
| Limited understanding of evidence and the role it plays. Typically ignores conflicting evidence.
| <br>
|-
| 2.
| Emerging
| Captures direct, supporting evidence and increasingly depends upon it.
| <br>
|-
| 3.
| Practicing
| Additionally, captures directly conflicting evidence.
| <br>
|-
| 4.
| Proficient
| Additionally, recognizes and captures indirect, supporting evidence. Utilizes negative evidence. Resolves conflicting evidence by accounting for it, explaining it, and reconciling the differences.
| <br>
|-
| 5.
| Stellar
| Additionally, recognizes and captures indirect, conflicting evidence.
| <br>
|}


=== Conclusions  ===
=== Conclusions  ===


{| width="100%" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1"
{{Template:Genealogical_Maturity_Conclusions_Table}}  
|-
! scope="col" | #
! scope="col" | Maturity Level
! scope="col" | Conclusions
! scope="col" | Check
|-
| 1.
| Entry
| In the absence of analysis, reaches conclusions by instinct.
| <br>
|-
| 2.
| Emerging
| Learning to evaluate the quality of sources, information, and evidence. Emerging ability to resolve minor discrepancies.
| <br>
|-
| 3.
| Practicing
| Additionally, resolves conflicting evidence or uses it to disprove prevalent opinion. Usually applies correct identity to persons mentioned in sources.
| <br>
|-
| 4.
| Proficient
| Additionally, when necessary creates soundly reasoned, coherently documented conclusions utilizing direct and indirect evidence.
| <br>
|-
| 5.
| Stellar
| Additionally: Publishes clear and convincing conclusions. Teaches and inspires others.
| <br>
|}


== Step 2. Inventory  ==
== Step 2. Inventory  ==


Identify the first blank row number in each category table.&nbsp; For example, in the Conclusions category if I placed check marks in rows 1 and 2 and no other rows, then row 3 is the first row without a check mark.<br>  
Identify the first blank row number in each category table. For example, in the Conclusions category if I placed check marks in rows 1 and 2 and no other rows, then row 3 is the first row without a check mark.<br>  


Write the first blank row numbers in this inventory table:<br>  
Write the first blank row numbers in this inventory table:<br>  


{| cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1" style="width: 248px; height: 129px;"
{| cellspacing="0" cellpadding="1" border="1" style="width: 248px; height: 129px;"
|-
|-
! scope="col" | Category<br>  
! scope="col" | Category<br>  
Line 231: Line 82:
Set a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMART_criteria S.M.A.R.T.] goal to improve in the identified skill or practice. A SMART goal is Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, and Time-bound.<br>  
Set a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMART_criteria S.M.A.R.T.] goal to improve in the identified skill or practice. A SMART goal is Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, and Time-bound.<br>  


For example, to improve in row 3 in the Conclusions category, I might set a goal to ask a [[Board for Certification of Genealogists|certified genealogist]] to recommend a book, article, or class that I might use to learn how to resolve conflicting evidence, and to complete this goal by the end of the week.  
For example, to improve in row 3 in the Conclusions category, I might set a goal to ask a [[Board for Certification of Genealogists|certified genealogis[[Category:Evaluating Evidence]]] to recommend a book, article, or class that I might use to learn how to resolve conflicting evidence, and to complete this goal by the end of the week.  


== Step 5. Iterate  ==
== Step 5. Iterate  ==
Line 241: Line 92:
== Notes  ==
== Notes  ==


<references /><br>


[[Category:Genealogy_Education]]
== References ==
<references />
 
[[Category:Baby Steps]][[Category:Evaluating Evidence]]
Approver, Batcheditor, Moderator, Patroller, Protector, Reviewer, Bots, Bureaucrats, editor, Interface administrators, pagecreator, pagedeleter, Page Ownership admin, Push subscription managers, Suppressors, Administrators, Upload Wizard campaign editors, Widget editors
321,763

edits