m (Text replace - "Category:Evaluating evidence" to "Category:Evaluating Evidence") |
(Fixed table issue.) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
'''evidence '''– 1. “something that furnishes proof.”<ref>''Merriam-Webster'', “evidence.”</ref> 2. “information that is relevant to the problem.”<ref>Mills, ''EE2'', 822.</ref> 3. analyzed and correlated information assessed to be of sufficient quality.<ref>Christine Rose,CG, CGL, FASG,, ''Genealogical Proof Standard: Building a Solid Case'' (San Jose, California: CR Publications, 2005), 2.</ref> 4. “the information that we conclude—after careful evaluation—supports or contradicts the statement we would like to make, or are about to make, about an ancestor.”<ref>The Board for Certification of Genealogists (BCG), ''The BCG Genealogical Standards Manual'', ed. Helen F. M. Leary, CG, CGL, FASG, (Provo, Utah: Ancestry, 2000), 8.</ref> | '''evidence '''– 1. “something that furnishes proof.”<ref>''Merriam-Webster'', “evidence.”</ref> 2. “information that is relevant to the problem.”<ref>Mills, ''EE2'', 822.</ref> 3. analyzed and correlated information assessed to be of sufficient quality.<ref>Christine Rose,CG, CGL, FASG,, ''Genealogical Proof Standard: Building a Solid Case'' (San Jose, California: CR Publications, 2005), 2.</ref> 4. “the information that we conclude—after careful evaluation—supports or contradicts the statement we would like to make, or are about to make, about an ancestor.”<ref>The Board for Certification of Genealogists (BCG), ''The BCG Genealogical Standards Manual'', ed. Helen F. M. Leary, CG, CGL, FASG, (Provo, Utah: Ancestry, 2000), 8.</ref> | ||
'''conclusion '''– 1. “a reasoned judgment.”<ref>''Merriam-Webster'', “conclusion.”</ref> 2. “a decision [that should b[[Category:Evaluating Evidence]] based on well-reasoned and thoroughly documented evidence gleaned from sound research.”<ref name="EE820">Mills, ''EE2'', 820.</ref> | '''conclusion '''– 1. “a reasoned judgment.”<ref>''Merriam-Webster'', “conclusion.”</ref> 2. “a decision [that should b[[Category:Evaluating Evidence]] based on well-reasoned and thoroughly documented evidence gleaned from sound research.”<ref name="EE820">Elizabeth Shown Mills, CG, CGL, FNGS, FASG, FUGA, ''Evidence Explained: Citing History Sources from Artifacts to Cyberspace'', 2nd ed. [hereinafter, ''EE2''] (Baltimore, Maryland: Genealogical Publishing Company, 2009), 820.</ref> | ||
== Step 1. Self Evaluation == | == Step 1. Self Evaluation == | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
== Step 2. Inventory == | == Step 2. Inventory == | ||
Identify the first blank row number in each category table. | Identify the first blank row number in each category table. For example, in the Conclusions category if I placed check marks in rows 1 and 2 and no other rows, then row 3 is the first row without a check mark.<br> | ||
Write the first blank row numbers in this inventory table:<br> | Write the first blank row numbers in this inventory table:<br> | ||
{| cellspacing=" | {| cellspacing="0" cellpadding="1" border="1" style="width: 248px; height: 129px;" | ||
|- | |- | ||
! scope="col" | Category<br> | ! scope="col" | Category<br> | ||
| Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
== Notes == | == Notes == | ||
<references / | |||
== References == | |||
<references /> | |||
[[Category:Baby Steps]][[Category:Evaluating Evidence]] | [[Category:Baby Steps]][[Category:Evaluating Evidence]] | ||
edits