99
edits
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
While no article can cover this subject thoroughly - entire books have been written about it - an overview of the use of aliases may help researchers discover connections within their families. Particular problems arise in identifying some individuals because many families changed their surnames, used | While no brief article can cover this subject thoroughly - entire books have been written about it - an overview of the use of aliases may help researchers discover connections within their families. Particular problems arise in identifying some individuals because many families changed their surnames, used patronymics, and had more than one living child with the same given name. "Cadet" branches of families also existed, with the same surname(s), further confusing records. | ||
What properly constitutes an alias? The Online 1911 Encyclopedia says: | What properly constitutes an alias? The Online 1911 Encyclopedia says: | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
By the 1500's, the practice of using alias surnames was sufficiently established for them to be recorded in official documents, as evidenced by frequent mentions in various registers, wills, and very importantly, in manorial court documents. The Ireland Tenures Act, 1662, refers to Dame Jane Chichester, alias Itchingham, wife, and in Foxe's "Book of Martyrs", Catherine Finlay alias Knight was included. | By the 1500's, the practice of using alias surnames was sufficiently established for them to be recorded in official documents, as evidenced by frequent mentions in various registers, wills, and very importantly, in manorial court documents. The Ireland Tenures Act, 1662, refers to Dame Jane Chichester, alias Itchingham, wife, and in Foxe's "Book of Martyrs", Catherine Finlay alias Knight was included. | ||
The use of | The use of aliases seem to fall within one of five basic reasons: | ||
1. Retention of patronymics. During the 16th century, many men were reluctant to abandon ancestral names, and consequently retained the forenames of their fathers or grandfathers as surnames. For example, William HARRY of Luxulyan, Cornwall, in 1547, was described (in a legal document) as William HARRY alias WATT - Watt being his grandfather's forename. These practices were not limited to "the gentry" who, because of land interests, made limited use of patronymics. According to John Chynoweth's book, "Tudor Cornwall", in the 1569 Muster Lists, 41% of the able-bodied men | 1. Retention of patronymics. During the 16th century, many men were reluctant to abandon ancestral names, and consequently retained the forenames of their fathers or grandfathers as surnames. For example, William HARRY of Luxulyan, Cornwall, in 1547, was described (in a legal document) as William HARRY alias WATT - Watt being his grandfather's forename. These practices were not limited to "the gentry" who, because of land interests, made limited use of patronymics. According to John Chynoweth's book, "Tudor Cornwall", in the 1569 Muster Lists for St. Ives, 41% of the able-bodied men thus mustered had the forenames of their fathers as surnames. | ||
2. Retention of topographical reference points - especially in relation to a manor or place name from which some families derived their surnames. A case in point is that of John RICHARDS of Bosavarne (1547), who had a son Thomas BOSAVARNE (1570), who had a son Martin THOMAS alias BOSAVARNE(1620). | 2. Retention of topographical reference points - especially in relation to a manor or place name from which some families derived their surnames. A case in point is that of John RICHARDS of Bosavarne (1547), who had a son Thomas BOSAVARNE (1570), who had a son Martin THOMAS alias BOSAVARNE(1620). | ||
In the 16th century, it was not unusual for a farmer to be born and grow up on a particular farm, and be identified by that name; i.e., John Thomas Penhall, son of Thomas Penhall. He would then marry, and either buy or rent another farm, and become John Thomas Trehair; lastly, as a prosperous farmer, he moved to a much bigger farm, and became John Thomas Stackhouse. | |||
In the 16th century, it was not unusual for a farmer to be born and grow up on a particular farm, and be identified by that name; i.e., John Thomas Penhall, son of Thomas Penhall. He would then marry, and either buy or rent another farm, and become John Thomas | |||
3. Commemoration by descendants of a marriage to a heiress, or to a member of a "socially superior" family. | 3. Commemoration by descendants of a marriage to a heiress, or to a member of a "socially superior" family. | ||
In some cases, persons legally changed their names to obtain an inheritance from a line in their family which was in danger of "dying out." | In some cases, persons legally changed their names to obtain an inheritance from a line in their family which was in danger of "dying out." For instance, men would take the name of their maternal uncle to become his legal heir. | ||
4. Illegitimacy. For example, John Reskymer had an illegitimate son with Margaret Gerber named John Reskymer alias Gerber. In later generations the son may well have been baptized as John Reskymer Gerber which, as with the use of an alias, served the purpose of publicly proclaiming his parental origins. | 4. Illegitimacy. For example, John Reskymer had an illegitimate son with Margaret Gerber named John Reskymer alias Gerber. In later generations the son may well have been baptized as John Reskymer Gerber which, as with the use of an alias, served the purpose of publicly proclaiming his parental origins. | ||
| Line 36: | Line 35: | ||
In the days of copyhold land, a persons' entitlement to land was only recorded in the manor court rolls. Deeds as they are known today, did not exist. The only "proof" one had that one owned particular land was in the "copy" rolls held by the manorial clerk. If a woman was widowed, and later remarried, the children of her first marriage often took the name of the step-father. But, to maintain their right to their inheritance, they would use the step-father's name as an alias. There were variations in this practice. In one well-documented case circa 1558, William Camborne married Elinor Wilton Paynter, a widow with seven children, and adopted the surname of her first husband, becoming William Camborne alias Paynter of Trelissick, St. Erth. Their descendants used both Paynter and the alias, with the use of Paynter eventually overtaking the use of Camborne. Direct descendants of Wm. Camborne and Elinor eventually became branches of the Paynter family. | In the days of copyhold land, a persons' entitlement to land was only recorded in the manor court rolls. Deeds as they are known today, did not exist. The only "proof" one had that one owned particular land was in the "copy" rolls held by the manorial clerk. If a woman was widowed, and later remarried, the children of her first marriage often took the name of the step-father. But, to maintain their right to their inheritance, they would use the step-father's name as an alias. There were variations in this practice. In one well-documented case circa 1558, William Camborne married Elinor Wilton Paynter, a widow with seven children, and adopted the surname of her first husband, becoming William Camborne alias Paynter of Trelissick, St. Erth. Their descendants used both Paynter and the alias, with the use of Paynter eventually overtaking the use of Camborne. Direct descendants of Wm. Camborne and Elinor eventually became branches of the Paynter family. | ||
Of course, aliases might be used in cases of adoption, as well. | |||
It must be kept in mind that not everyone in a particular family used the same, or any, alias, and an alias might be used by someone who married into the family, not just those born into it. The use of particular alises could be a long-lived practice; in one known case, the alias was maintained for 221 years. | |||
Fortunately, the use of two (or more) surnames sometimes appear in wills, the benefactor wishing to be unambiguous about the potential beneficiary. Manorial records, and, later, land records may also be sources of information. Spelling, however, was fluid, and most frequently records were in Latin. | |||
As for forenames, persons were often given the fore-names of their godparents. In the 1550's five Erisey daughters were baptised, four of which were given the name of one godmother. Many families gave multiple children in the same generation the same, or almost the same, forename For instance, Marianne Symons, Mary Ann Symons, Mary Anne Symons, and Mary Symons were all baptised circa 1815-1830 in the same family. | |||
During the early 1800's, it became fashionable to give the paternal grandmother's name as a second given name. It can greatly benefit a researcher when a family used that name for several generations, as was frequently done. Often these names reflect two or more of the above factors, which become additional bonuses. | |||