318,531
edits
m
Text replace - "Category:Evaluating evidence" to "Category:Evaluating Evidence"
(Reorder first to paragraphs) |
m (Text replace - "Category:Evaluating evidence" to "Category:Evaluating Evidence") |
||
| (16 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is the syllabus for a series of classes | This is the syllabus for one of a series of classes taught by '''[[User:RaymondRS|Robert Raymond]]''' and represents his private opinions. Suggestions for changes should be made on this page's [[Talk:Information Baby Steps|Talk page]]. See other articles in this series at: | ||
:[[Sources and Baby Steps|Sources and Baby Steps]] | |||
:[[Evidence Baby Steps|Evidence Baby Steps]] | |||
:[[Conclusions and Baby Steps|Conclusions and Baby Steps]] | |||
:[[Citation Baby Steps|Citation Baby Steps]] | |||
:[[Genealogical Maturity|Genealogical Maturity]] | |||
= Baby Steps = | == Baby Steps == | ||
{{Template:Baby_Steps_Intro|information}} | |||
{{Template:Genealogical_Maturity_Information_Table}} | |||
== Level 1: Entry level Genealogists == | |||
“Just because you read it in print or see it on the Internet doesn’t make it true.” | “Just because you read it in print or see it on the Internet doesn’t make it true.” | ||
Many erroneous pedigrees exist in print or on the Internet. Some are the results of careless research or typographical errors which are propagated from pedigree to pedigree. Some are out-right fraudulent. Fraudulent genealogies are often created to qualify for membership in lineage societies such as the Sons of the American Revolution or the Mayflower Society. Gustave Anjou, a rather famous perpetrator, fabricated genealogies as a professional genealogist. | Many erroneous pedigrees exist in print or on the Internet. Some are the results of careless research or typographical errors which are propagated from pedigree to pedigree. Some are out-right fraudulent. Fraudulent genealogies are often created to qualify for membership in lineage societies such as the Sons of the American Revolution or the Mayflower Society. Gustave Anjou, a rather famous perpetrator, fabricated genealogies as a professional genealogist.<ref>Milton Rubincam, ''Pitfalls in Genealogical Research'' (Salt Lake City: Ancestry, 1987), 62-4.</ref> | ||
Records themselves are not above mistakes. The military pension application of Alonzo Pearis Raymond indicates he was born in 1819 when he was actually born two years later. His death certificate says his parents were from England; in fact they were from New England. | Records themselves are not above mistakes. The military pension application of Alonzo Pearis Raymond indicates he was born in 1819 when he was actually born two years later. His death certificate says his parents were from England; in fact they were from New England. | ||
| Line 64: | Line 22: | ||
Having never experienced such errors, beginning genealogists tend to believe more than they should. The truth is that records don’t always tell the truth. | Having never experienced such errors, beginning genealogists tend to believe more than they should. The truth is that records don’t always tell the truth. | ||
= Level 2: Emerging Genealogists = | == Level 2: Emerging Genealogists == | ||
With experience, genealogists come to realize that not all information is created equal. Take for example the information on a death certificate. The information provided by the doctor about the date and cause of death tends to be factual and reliable. The accuracy of the information provided by the informant (named near the bottom of the certificate) depends on what he or she knew. Generally he knows the decedent’s name and address. He is almost as reliable with marriage status and a little less so with birth date. Accuracy drops successively for birth place, parents’ names, and parents’ birth place. | With experience, genealogists come to realize that not all information is created equal. Take for example the information on a death certificate. The information provided by the doctor about the date and cause of death tends to be factual and reliable. The accuracy of the information provided by the informant (named near the bottom of the certificate) depends on what he or she knew. Generally he knows the decedent’s name and address. He is almost as reliable with marriage status and a little less so with birth date. Accuracy drops successively for birth place, parents’ names, and parents’ birth place. | ||
| Line 70: | Line 28: | ||
This situation confuses the concept of primary and secondary sources. Is a death certificate a primary source or a secondary source? The information about birth and parents is second hand. It is secondary information. The information about death is primary information. While the concept of primary/secondary sources works well in other fields, it fails genealogists. ''Information, not sources, is primary or secondary.'' | This situation confuses the concept of primary and secondary sources. Is a death certificate a primary source or a secondary source? The information about birth and parents is second hand. It is secondary information. The information about death is primary information. While the concept of primary/secondary sources works well in other fields, it fails genealogists. ''Information, not sources, is primary or secondary.'' | ||
= Level 3: Practicing Genealogists = | == Level 3: Practicing Genealogists == | ||
We must take several factors into account to judge the quality of information. | We must take several factors into account to judge the quality of information. | ||
Primary information carries more weight than secondary information. “Information is primary if it was made orally or in writing (or even pictorially as in a painting or photograph) by someone in a position to know firsthand (such as an eyewitness or participant) and recorded in a timely manner while memory is fresh.” | Primary information carries more weight than secondary information. “Information is primary if it was made orally or in writing (or even pictorially as in a painting or photograph) by someone in a position to know firsthand (such as an eyewitness or participant) and recorded in a timely manner while memory is fresh.”<ref>Christine Rose, ''Genealogical Proof Standard: Building a Solid Case'', 3rd ed. (San Jose, California: CR Publications, 2005), 6-7.</ref> | ||
The timing of creation of the record affects its accuracy. The longer an eyewitness waits to record an event, the more their memory is subject to error. The information is considered secondary when not recorded promptly. It should be kept in mind that whether considered primary or secondary, we consider the accuracy of the information to decline over time.<ref>Elizabeth Shown Mills, ''Evidence Explained: Citing History Sources from Artifacts to Cyberspace'', 2nd ed. (Baltimore, Maryland: Genealogical Publishing Company, 2009), 37.</ref> | |||
The quality of the information is affected by the informant, the person who supplied the information. How did he get his information? Was he an eyewitness? Was he biased?<ref>Rose, ''Genealogical Proof Standard'', 6-7, 14, 53.</ref> The quality of the information is affected by the recorder. Was he acting in an official capacity? | |||
The | The quality of the information is affected by the motivations of the informant and the recorder. Many military records contain erroneous birth dates provided by volunteers too young to sign up. Pensioners may lie about eligibility requirements such as length of service or marriage date. People may claim to be older or younger than they actually are. Applicants may fabricate information to qualify to join a lineage society.<ref>Rose, ''Genealogical Proof Standard'', 15.</ref> | ||
When primary information is copied from an original, the information remains primary, even though the new source is a derivative source.<ref>Rose, ''Genealogical Proof Standard'', 8.</ref> | |||
== Level 4: Proficient Genealogists == | |||
Understanding the information we see in records depends on understanding the world in which it was recorded and the reasons for why it was recorded. As the old saying goes, “times, they are a changing.” Definitions change. Standards evolve. Laws are created or amended. Paradigms shift. Context is always evolving. | |||
For example, the meaning of the abbreviation “Ia” depends on when and where it was used. Whereas today IA is the postal abbreviation for Iowa, in the 19th century it was often used as the abbreviation for Indiana. Ancestry.com seems to have missed this point in their 1850 U.S. Census database. Many of the 100,000 Indianans they indicate were born in Iowa were actually born in Indiana. | For example, the meaning of the abbreviation “Ia” depends on when and where it was used. Whereas today IA is the postal abbreviation for Iowa, in the 19th century it was often used as the abbreviation for Indiana. Ancestry.com seems to have missed this point in their 1850 U.S. Census database. Many of the 100,000 Indianans they indicate were born in Iowa were actually born in Indiana. | ||
= Level 5: Stellar Genealogists = | == Level 5: Stellar Genealogists == | ||
Stellar genealogists are able to tease information out of a record that eludes the grasp of other genealogists. | Stellar genealogists are able to tease information out of a record that eludes the grasp of other genealogists. | ||
As an example, genealogists hate alphabetized census records because alphabetizing all the names removes information about who lived next to whom. Elizabeth Shown Mills faced such a problem with a tax list organized by first letter of last name. She noticed groups of strictly alphabetized surnames seemed to match the tax officials’ visits to neighborhoods. This information allowed her to break through a longstanding brick wall. | As an example, genealogists hate alphabetized census records because alphabetizing all the names removes information about who lived next to whom. Elizabeth Shown Mills faced such a problem with a tax list organized by first letter of last name. She noticed groups of strictly alphabetized surnames seemed to match the tax officials’ visits to neighborhoods. This information allowed her to break through a longstanding brick wall.<ref>Elizabeth Shown Mills, “‘Margaret’s Baby’s Father and the Lessons He Taught Me’: Identifying the father of an illegitimate child,” BCG lecture series for FamilySearch personnel, 12 October 2009.</ref> | ||
= | == Summary == | ||
From ''sources ''we find ''information''. From ''information ''we select ''evidence''. From ''evidence ''we make ''conclusions''. ''Conclusions'' reference ''citations''. ''Citations'' point back to ''sources''. | |||
Information can be primary or secondary while sources are original or derivative. Information quality differs, depending on source type, informant knowledge, and elapsed time. Subtle bits of information are obtainable with a knowledge of history and the circumstances of record creation. | |||
Using the table at the start of this handout, and using what you learned in class today, set a small, baby step improvement goal with a deadline. When the deadline arrives, repeat. If you will consistently pursue baby step goals, your genealogical experience will consistently improve. | |||
== Continuing Education == | |||
Advancing from level to level requires continuing education. Avail yourself of these resources: | |||
{{Template:Baby_Steps_Continuing_Education}} | |||
= | == Notes == | ||
<references /> | |||
[[Category: | [[Category:Baby Steps]][[Category:Evaluating Evidence]] | ||