FamilySearch Wiki talk:Three-Revert Rule: Difference between revisions
(New page: == Help Define the Policy == * The "three-revert rule" is described in Policy document as reverting any page or any part of a page more than 3 times in 24 hours. Does this definition need...) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
* Administrators should be able to monitor reported violations of the three-revert rule. (Wikipedia does this through a noticeboard.) | * Administrators should be able to monitor reported violations of the three-revert rule. (Wikipedia does this through a noticeboard.) | ||
== Wikipedia Examples == | |||
When defining the policy and the procedures for the three-revert rule, the current practices at Wikipedia might be helpful: | |||
* The user is notified of their violation of the 3RR by adding the 3rr template to their user page. | When defining the policy and the procedures for the three-revert rule, the current practices at Wikipedia might be helpful: | ||
* When a user in Wikipedia is notified that they are possibly violating the 3-revert rule, the notice they are given states: | |||
<blockquote>"''You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution''." (See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Uw-3rr Template 3rr] for full Wikipedia documentation.) </blockquote> | *The user is notified of their violation of the 3RR by adding the 3rr template to their user page. | ||
*When a user in Wikipedia is notified that they are possibly violating the 3-revert rule, the notice they are given states: | |||
<blockquote>"''You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution''." (See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Uw-3rr Template 3rr] for full Wikipedia documentation.)</blockquote> |
Revision as of 13:48, 4 May 2009
Help Define the Policy[edit source]
- The "three-revert rule" is described in Policy document as reverting any page or any part of a page more than 3 times in 24 hours. Does this definition need expanding to include a "large number of reversions" to multiple pages, not just a single page?
- The consequence stated for violation of this rule is that action might taken against your account by an administrator. What action will be taken?
Help Define the Procedures[edit source]
- How should the three-revert rule be reported, and to whom is the violation reported?
- Who should evaluate the reported violations of the three-revert rule?
- How is the evaluation completed? What has to be evaluated?
- What is the time frame for follow-up on reported violations?
- What recourse does an author have when they have been reported for violating the three-revert rule?
- If the reporting of the violation is done through the author's user page by using a template/flag, does the template ever get removed from the user's page? What if the issue was fixed right away by the author?
Development Needed[edit source]
- Create a fully functioning template (flag) for the three-revert rule. This is more than just a simple flag. The template needs to automate the process of referencing which page or pages in the wiki the notice is for.
- Create a category for the three-revert rule.
- Both the wiki code process and the simple process should be implemented and described in the documentation.
- Document the procedure for escalating reported violations to administrators so necessary action can be taken.
- Administrators should be able to monitor reported violations of the three-revert rule. (Wikipedia does this through a noticeboard.)
Wikipedia Examples[edit source]
When defining the policy and the procedures for the three-revert rule, the current practices at Wikipedia might be helpful:
- The user is notified of their violation of the 3RR by adding the 3rr template to their user page.
- When a user in Wikipedia is notified that they are possibly violating the 3-revert rule, the notice they are given states:
"You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution." (See Template 3rr for full Wikipedia documentation.)