Information for "Using Major Original Sources - International Institute"

Basic information

Display titleUsing Major Original Sources - International Institute
Default sort keyUsing Major Original Sources - International Institute
Page length (in bytes)35,295
Page ID164853
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page1
Counted as a content pageYes
Page imageIIGS-2023-1920x1080.png

Page protection

EditAllow all users (infinite)
MoveAllow all users (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creatorNationalInstitute (talk | contribs)
Date of page creation13:04, 5 June 2014
Latest editorBatsondl (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit10:54, 11 May 2023
Total number of edits28
Total number of distinct authors10
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days)0
Recent number of distinct authors0

Page properties

Transcluded templates (5)

Templates used on this page:

SEO properties

Description

Content

Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements.
Good research requires more than one piece of evidence to prove each point, simply because no one source can be relied upon 100%. There is no magic number as a lot depends upon the credibility of each source and whether the sources are truly independent. Say, your Grandad provided the information for the census giving Brighton as his birthplace, and he also wrote this in a letter to your aunt, and told his son who told you—these are really only one source aren’t they! As a good starting point I suggest that you find three independent sources that give the same information. It is also unwise to rely on only one type of source, thus three census records are not as good as oral family information, a christening record and one census. Be aware that any source may have errors, sometimes several on one sheet!
Information from Extension:WikiSEO